Tuesday, 7 February 2012


A Criticism of the Sunday Observance Cases
Big M (top of p 844): It is undoubtedly true that both [religious and secular elements] may be present in any given enactment, indeed it is almost inevitable that they will be, considering that such laws combine a prohibition of ordinary employment for one day out of seven with a specification  that this day of rest shall be the Christian Sabbath- Sunday.
Edwards (p853): One is not being compelled to engage in religious practices merely because a statutory obligation coincides with the dictates of a particular religion. I cannot accept for example, that [prohibiting murder] is a state enforced compulsion to conform to religious practices.

1 comment:

  1. Trinity Western - The Aftermath
    ________________________________

    Teacher: Well class, when I did my teaching degree at TWU, I was taught that gay people should become straight because this better accords with my religious beliefs.

    Johnny: You are making my ears bleed! Please stop, I can't take any more!

    (Johnny starts sobbing uncontrollably.)

    Teacher: Okay, let's move on class. Who can tell me the square root of 36?

    Johnny (still sobbing): Why didn't the Supreme Court of Canada protect me? Why????????????

    ReplyDelete